Berkeley - If you need help with your marriage, the advice of long-married older friends and relatives may be more helpful than that of a marriage counselor, according to a new study by University of California, Berkeley, researchers.
The study, which appears in the February issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family, found that expertise in gauging how happy married couples are is greatest among couples who have been in long marriages.
The results surprised Rachel Ebling, a UC Berkeley psychology student, and UC Berkeley psychology professor Robert Levenson, who prepared the report.
"We thought marital researchers would do well," said Ebling. "But those with a vested personal interest in relationships did better. "
"We feel we have identified an important untapped resource
for researchers and clinicians," added Ebling. "Clinicians-in-training
may get some interesting and important insights by talking
to couples who have been married for a long time."
The idea for this study came from, of all places, the wedding of one of Levenson's friends.
"At the table at the reception, there were all kinds of different
people — coworkers, relatives of the couple and friends," Levenson
said. "Everyone at the table had an opinion as to whether the
marriage would last."
That prompted Levenson and Ebling to devise studies about
two issues — how accurately people of varying backgrounds could
predict whether a couple would stay married and how well people
could evaluate whether a couple had a good marriage.
Ebling and Levenson studied nine different groups of people.
Those in the professional groups were marital researchers,
marital therapists, pastoral counselors and graduate students
in clinical psychology. The nonprofessional groups included
couples who were in long-term happy first marriages, couples
in long-term unhappy first marriages, newly married individuals,
newly divorced individuals and UC Berkeley undergraduates.
The data were gathered from individuals in a very simple, straightforward
way. People watched 10 three-minute videotaped segments (recorded
six to 13 years earlier) of
couples talking about a conflict specific particular
to their relationship.
The evaluators then filled out a questionnaire.
Some literature suggests that most people do not need
much time — as little as 30 seconds — to make a social
judgement, so Levenson and Ebling felt three minutes was
On the issue of whether a couple would stay married, all
groups were correct an average of 53.8 percent of the time,
faring only slightly better than chance.
But when it came to the people who could best predict
which couples had happy marriages, the nonprofessionals
did better than the professionals. The average percent
of correct ratings for the four groups of non-professionals
was 61 percent, while the average percent of correct ratings
for the four professional groups was only 52 percent.
Additionally, the group of participants in long-term satisfied
marriages were the most accurate group of all, with a 64
percent accuracy rate.
"Those for whom marriage held high personal meaning, as
rated by a panel of judges, were more accurate than those
with professional training," the researchers wrote.
Other accurate judges were people who paid the most attention
to expressions of disgust, criticism or contempt. "Being
highly critical or feeling your spouse is falling below
a standard is very indicative of an unhappy marriage," Levenson
said. He added that the couples' expressions of anger did
not necessarily indicate the happiness or unhappiness
of the marriage.
The findings raised an important question: Why are certain kinds of professional training related to marriage associated with lower levels of accuracy in judging marital satisfaction, relative to certain kinds of personal experience?
"[A] possible explanation for the low levels of accuracy
among marriage professionals in our study is that this
results not from training but rather from the experience
of working with primarily distressed couples," Levenson
and Ebling wrote. "Another possibility is that marriage
professionals have become accustomed to making judgements
based on much more protracted observations of couples'
behavior, and thus find it both difficult and unfamiliar
to make these judgments based on the kinds of brief samples
of marital behavior used in the present study."
The researchers also commented that the groups of marriage professionals likely included those for whom the personal significance of marriage varies.
So while Ebling and Levenson do not suggest couples abandon counseling, they do suggest that consulting with older friends and relatives may provide additional insights.
An unhappy marriage can be a lonely place," Levenson said. "Who do you talk to? While I'm not saying that Grandma or Granddad can fix broken marriages, they can be a good resource to identify reasons a couple may be in trouble."