UC Berkeley NewsView of Campanile and Golden Gate Bridge
NewsCenter
Today's news & events
Berkeleyan home
Berkeleyan archive
News by email
For the news media
Calendar of events
Top stories
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Berkeleyan

North Koreans open to dialogue, say organizers of Berkeley conference

| 19 March 2003

Delegates from North Korea, the United States, and several Asian countries discussed regional security and tense global relations last week at a two-day conference at Berkeley’s Institute of East Asian Studies. “We don’t expect diplomatic breakthroughs, but we do expect enhanced communication,” said event co-chair Robert Bedeski in a press briefing March 14.

Although the invitation-only conference was the tenth annual meeting of the North Pacific Working Group, this was the first time it had been held in the United States The working group is part of the Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific, chartered in 1993 to offer structured, nongovernmental processes that increase regional confidence building and security. The representatives meet simply as private individuals for what Bedeski described as “a high-powered seminar,” not an official summit.

Approximately 30 faculty members and government officials from North Korea, Canada, China, India, Japan, Mongolia, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea, the European Union, and the United States took part in the conference.

The North Korean delegates — including the country’s ambassador to the United Nations and the deputy director and a senior researcher from its Institute for Disarmament and Peace — seemed “more open than we have seen in the past,” said Bedeski, a political science professor at the University of Victoria.

Bedeski emphasized that specific issues like North Korea’s nuclear reactor program and recent face-off with U.S. military aircraft were not under scrutiny. “There are some general discussions on issues of security and the activities of the United States,” he said. “North Koreans essentially want a dialogue between the United States and itself ... they are seeking greater reinforcement or validation that the U.S. will not act aggressively toward them.”

Delegates from Japan and the other Asian countries had come with the hopes of initiating an informal multilateral dialogue, said the conference’s other co-chair, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, a professor in the department of advanced social and international studies at the University of Tokyo. They wanted “to achieve clarity” on certain issues in order to communicate effective ideas about cooperation to their respective governments.

The event’s host, T.J. Pempel, director of Berkeley’s Institute of East Asian Studies and a professor of political science, went further. “Quite clearly the North Koreans are following a multi-track strategy, and on the one hand are waving the sticks that suggest that they will not be pushed around by any others — whether you want to call that paranoia or self-defense is a matter of choice,” he said, emphasizing that this was only his personal view. “But the flip side is that the North Koreans have every incentive to try and open a dialogue to see where there is room for resolution of the issues. I think in doing that, they’re hopeful that coming to the U.S., coming to a meeting that includes representatives of many other governments, will speed resolution of the tension.”

The conference had already reduced the recent friction between South Korea and the U.S., Bedeski recounted, through a discussion of the U.S. media’s misquoting of a South Korean official. This time, he said, they could speak “candidly, with the understanding that their statements will not go directly to the press. It provides governments some release from official positions and allows more freewheeling discussion.”

That discussion could have far-reaching effects, suggested Pempel. “The Council and other Track 2 [nongovernmental] processes try to create a broader climate of trust and to create a number of individuals who know each other on a less formal basis — who, in the event of future difficulties, perhaps can get on the phone, shoot one another an e-mail, run up a trial balloon, or whatever might make it possible for a quicker and easier resolution of tensions.”